Does Complete Paraplegic Ever Walk Again

• Journal List
• Forepart Hum Neurosci
• v.8; 2014
• PMC3952432

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8: 141.

Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury

Giorgio Scivoletto

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

ⁱⁱClinical and Research Motility Analysis Lab, Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Federica Tamburella

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Southward. Lucia, Rome, Italy

²Clinical and Research Motility Analysis Lab, Fondazione South. Lucia, Rome, Italia

Letizia Laurenza

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italia

Monica Torre

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Southward. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Marco Molinari

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Southward. Lucia, Rome, Italy

^twoClinical and Research Movement Assay Lab, Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Received 2013 Dec four; Accepted 2014 Feb 26.

Abstract

The recovery of walking function is considered of farthermost relevance both by patients and physicians. Consequently, in the contempo years, recovery of locomotion become a major objective of new pharmacological and rehabilitative interventions. In the last decade, several pharmacological treatment and rehabilitative approaches have been initiated to raise locomotion capacity of SCI patients. Bones science advances in regeneration of the central nervous system hold promise of further neurological and functional recovery to be studied in clinical trials. Therefore, a precise knowledge of the natural grade of walking recovery after SCI and of the factors affecting the prognosis for recovery has become mandatory. In the present work we reviewed the prognostic factors for walking recovery, with item attending paid to the clinical ones (neurological test at admission, age, etiology gender, time course of recovery). The prognostic value of some instrumental examinations has too been reviewed. Based on these factors we suggest that a reliable prognosis for walking recovery is possible. Instrumental examinations, in item evoked potentials could be useful to improve the prognosis.

Keywords: spinal cord injury, walking recovery, prognostic factors

Introduction

Walking recovery is ane of the main goals of patients after SCI: walking is rated at beginning identify (together with bladder and bowel role) at least by patients with incomplete lesions (Ditunno et al., 2008a). Furthermore, an epidemiological written report shows an increment of the number of patients with incomplete lesions (e.k., with chances of walking recovery) (Pagliacci et al., 2003). Therefore, the recovery of ambulation has become the target of several pharmacological and rehabilitative approaches (Wernig and Muller, 1992; Domingo et al., 2012) and a precise evaluation of the natural recovery of walking and of the prognostic factors influencing this function has become mandatory (Steeves et al., 2007).

In the nowadays work we reviewed the effect of several clinical and demographic features on the prognosis for walking recovery. Furthermore, because one of the main problems of the acute phase of SCI is the lack of reliable examinations, we considered the prognostic value of neurophysiological and neuroimaging examinations.

Finally, the upshot of early pharmacological and surgical interventions on walking recovery will be examined.

Materials and methods

A systematic search was performed of all papers every bit well equally websites mentioning spinal cord injury and walking The literature search was conducted without time limits to place papers that explicitly mentioned the walking capacity in patients with SCI. Databases included PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus, which includes Embase citations. All written report designs, including instance reports, were included, with no restrictions on the ages of participants. Non-English language articles and animal studies were excluded. The following search terms were used: prognosis prediction, SCI, paraplegia/tetraplegia/quadriplegia, ambulation/gait and walking/walking capacity. In addition, other databases, such equally Google and a hand search of Spinal Cord yielded other citations not identified past the above strategy.

2 authors (Giorgio Scivoletto and Federica Tamburella) independently identified and classified the papers through a review of the abstracts, texts, and references and circulated them to the authors' panel.

Clinical examination

The most relevant prognostic factor for functional recovery in SCI patients is the neurological condition at the moment of the first examination. The physical examination of these patients has been standardized by the American Spinal Injury Association in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) (American Spinal Injury Clan, 2000). Based on this test it is possible to found the neurological level of injury, equally well as the severity of the lesion (damage). Components also include a rectal examination for voluntary anal contraction and anal sensation (Figures ​ one, ​ 2). Patients are considered to accept a complete lesion (AIS impairment A), co-ordinate to the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), in the absenteeism of sensory or motor role at the lowest sacral segments. Incomplete lesions are defined when awareness and/or motor function are preserved below the neurologic level of injury, and in particular in the everyman sacral segments (anal sensation, including deep anal pressure and voluntary external anal sphincter contraction) (Figure ​ 2).

Scoring sheet for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2013; Atlanta, GA. Reprinted 2013.

Scoring sheet for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2013; Atlanta, GA. Reprinted 2013.

This examination should usually exist performed at 72 h after the lesion considering this timing seems to take a more accurate prognostic value than earlier assessment (Herbison et al., 1991).

AIS grade conversion and walking recovery

For the aim of this review nosotros would define walking recovery as the regained ability to walk independently in the community, with or without the apply of devices and braces. This is also defined "functional walking" and has been described by several authors (Hussey and Stauffer, 1973) as the chapters to walk reasonable distances both in and out of abode unassisted by another person.

For a long time AIS class conversion has been considered the basis to predict the possibility of achieving functional walking. Withal, a recent article past van Middendorp et al. (2009) questioned the relationship betwixt AIS form conversion and ability to walk equally we will show below.

Patients with AIS impairment A (motor and sensory consummate lesion) at their first examination have very few chances of neurological recovery below the lesion. When the test is performed at 72 h post-injury, 80% of the initial AIS A patients remain as AIS A, with most 10% converting to AIS B (i.e., some sensory function) and about 10% converting to AIS C (with some motor recovery below the lesion) (Burns et al., 2012). However, if the beginning test is performed later, the percentage of comeback decreases dramatically to 2.5% (Scivoletto et al., 2004a) (Tabular array ​ ane). Accordingly, the possibility of patients with AIS impairment A of achieving functional walking is very limited also. Furthermore, also between the patients who converted to an incomplete lesion only 14% recovered some walking office (van Middendorp et al., 2009). The AIS A patients who reach some walking function normally are depression thoracic or lumbar levels (T12-L3) and need braces and devices to walk (Ditunno et al., 2008b; Tabular array ​ 2). Finally, these patients are usually limited ambulators, with slow average velocities and nifty energy expenditure (Vaccaro et al., 1997).

Table ane

Prediction of recovery co-ordinate to AIS harm scale.

AIS course at admission	A	B	C	D
First test at 72 hten	I-yr follow-up AIS grade
A	84%	8%	v%	iii%
B	10%	30%	29%	31%
C	two%	two%	25%	67%
D	2%	one%	2%	85%
First examination at 30 daysxi	I-year follow-up AIS grade
A	95%	0	2,five%	2,5%
B	0	53%	21%	26%
C	one%	0	45%	54%
D	2%	0	0	96%

Table ii

Prediction of functional walking according to AIS impairment and other features.

AIS/lesion level at admission	Functional walking/authors (references)
AIS A/cervical lesion	0% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
	0% (Ditunno et al., 2008b)
AIS A/thoracic and lumbar lesions	five% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
	8.5% (Ditunno et al., 2008b)
AIS at access and sensation	% recovery of community ambulation at 1 twelvemonth post-injury/authors (references)
AIS B (only light touch preservation)	0% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
	eleven% (Crozier et al., 1991)
	33% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
AIS B (light affect + pin prick preservation)	89% (Crozier et al., 1991)
	66% (Foo et al., 1981)
	75% (Katoh and el Masry, 1995)
AIS at admission and age	% recovery of community ambulation at ane year mail-injury/authors (references)
AIS C < 50 years	91% (Burns et al., 1997)
	71% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)
AIS C > 50 years	42% (Burns et al., 1997)
	25% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)
AIS D < 50 years	100% (Burns et al., 1997)
	100% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)
AIS D > 50 years	100% (Burns et al., 1997)
	lxxx% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)

AIS grade B patients (those with motor complete, sensory incomplete lesion at 72 h exam) commonly show some motor recovery and they tin can convert to AIS C or even AIS D grade. Still, the overall recovery of ambulation is considered to be about 33% (Katoh and el Masry, 1995; van Middendorp et al., 2009). The percentage of walking recovery may vary depending on the modality of the sensation spared at the lowest sacral segments. Several studies reported a relationship between pinprick preservation and recovery in AIS B patients. AIS course B patients with pinprick preservation take a better walking recovery than those with light touch only (Foo et al., 1981; Crozier et al., 1991; Waters et al., 1994a; Katoh and el Masry, 1995; Oleson et al., 2005) (Table ​ 2). This finding has an anatomical basis at the spinal cord level. The preservation of pinprick perception together with calorie-free impact one indicates less extensive harm to the spino-thalamic tracts and posterior column. Therefore, in these cases, at that place is a high likelihood of some sparing of the motor pathways conveyed by the nearby cortico-spinal tracts (Oleson et al., 2005).

Motor incomplete (AIS C) patients have a better prognosis for walking recovery than sensory incomplete ones. The overall rate of recovery is near 75% (Maynard et al., 1979; Crozier et al., 1992; Waters et al., 1994b; van Middendorp et al., 2009). This pct includes both the patients who converted to AIS D and those who remained AIS C but attain at to the lowest degree some walking function (van Middendorp et al., 2009); these patients probably have depression thoracic or lumbar lesions and walk with braces and devices. Several factors may influence the run a risk of walking recovery in these patients: lower extremity force, motor recovery timing, age and upper extremity force for tetraplegic patients are the most important ones (Crozier et al., 1992; Waters et al., 1994b). In AIS C patients age seems to be a strong prognostic factor for walking recovery. Age represents a articulate negative prognostic cistron for walking recovery: AIS C subjects younger than 50 years have a take a chance of achieving functional walking of lxxx–90%, simply this percentage dramatically decreases to thirty–40% in older patients (Tabular array ​ 2) (Perot and Vera, 1982; Foo, 1986; Burns et al., 1997; Scivoletto et al., 2003). Unlike hypotheses have been offered to explain the negative effect of age. The functional potential for a given neurological deficit is lower at older age; this may be considered reasonable since functional abilities by and large decline as people's age increases. In normal ageing "reserve (top) capacity" (or "vitality") (DiGiovanna, 2000) seems to superlative at around 30 years of age, and and then gradually declines until death. Disease processes, including SCI and its complications, are considered to accelerate this procedure of decline. Jakob et al. (2009) offers another possible explanation. In his written report he found that age is not correlated with neurologic recovery, but is correlated with a worse functional event in terms of independence in daily life activities and walking function. He therefore suggested that the neurological recovery is not directly related to the functional event and that elderly patients have difficulties in translating neurological recovery into positive functional changes.

Finally, AIS D patients at admission take very good ambulation prognosis at i year post-injury (Burns et al., 1997; Scivoletto et al., 2003). All patients, regardless of age, who initially were classified as AIS D (within 72 h) were able to walk at the time of discharge from inpatient rehabilitation (Burns et al., 1997; van Middendorp et al., 2009).

Other clinical factors

In addition to AIS class, several other factors evaluated at 72 h after the lesion have been considered in the prognosis of walking recovery and are examined below.

Reflexes

In the very early examination of SCI patients the presence/absence of the delayed plantar response (DPR) must be assessed. DPR is characterized by a delayed response to an unusually strong stimulus to the sole of the human foot (Weinstein et al., 1997). The onset of this response post-obit the stimulus could exist 500 ms or a full second following the initiation of the stimulus (Weinstein et al., 1997). The DPR shows a reciprocal relationship with the Babinski sign and information technology is peculiarly relevant because it allows the prognosis during the spinal shock stage (Ko et al., 1999). The DPR is a negative prognostic indicator as it is more often present and lasts longer (more than 1 day) in SCI patients who do not recover any voluntary movement (Weinstein et al., 1997; Ko et al., 1999).

Syndromes

Based on the distribution of sensory and motor loss, the ISNCSCI allow to identify several incomplete spinal cord syndromes with dissimilar prognostic values.

The key string syndrome (CCS) is mostly seen following cervical lesion. Information technology represents about 9% of the total SCIs and 44% of the clinical syndromes (McKinley et al., 2007) and is characterized by a greater involvement of the upper extremities than the lower extremities. The CCS is a clinical picture that recognizes several causes (with and without os injury) and several dissimilar mechanisms (including direct injury of the spinal cord or vascular injuries) (McKinley et al., 2007) that primarily affects the centre of the spinal cord and generally has a favorable prognosis as to independence in daily life activities and bladder and bowel office recovery (Newey et al., 2000; Dvorak et al., 2005; Aito et al., 2006). Because of the bottom involvement of the lower extremities, CCS is considered to have a good prognosis for walking recovery besides (Merriam et al., 1986; Penrod et al., 1990; Roth et al., 1990; Burns et al., 1997; Aito et al., 2006). The percentage of patients who recover walking varies from 40 to 97%, simply is strongly influenced past historic period. Several studies confirm that younger patients (less than 50 years sometime) take twice the chance of achieving independent walking than older ones (Foo, 1986; Merriam et al., 1986; Penrod et al., 1990; Roth et al., 1990; Burns et al., 1997; Newey et al., 2000; Dvorak et al., 2005; Aito et al., 2006).

The Brown-Séquard syndrome (BSS) is characterized by ipsilateral hemiplegia and contralateral hemianalgesia due to spinal hemisection (Brown-Sequard, 1868). It accounts for ii–iv% of all traumatic SCIs and 17% of the clinical syndromes (McKinley et al., 2007). The pure form of BSS is rarely seen and the Chocolate-brown-Séquard Plus Syndrome (relative ipsilateral hemiplegia with a relative contralateral hemianalgesia) is much more than frequent (Roth et al., 1991). BSS is more frequent at cervical level and is usually associated with stab-wound injuries (Gentleman and Harrington, 1984). BSS is characterized past a skilful functional prognosis. Near 75% of patients achieve independent walking at discharge from rehabilitation (Stahlman and Hanley, 1992). In this framework an important predictor for walking recovery is the distribution of the impairment: if the upper limb is weaker than the lower limb, then patients are more than probable to ambulate at discharge (Kirshblum and O'Connor, 1998).

The anterior cord syndrome is due to a lesion that involves the anterior two thirds of the spinal cord and preserves the posterior columns (Maynard et al., 1997), and account for 1% of all the SCIs and 5% of the clinical syndromes (McKinley et al., 2007). It may derive from a retropulsed disc or bone fragments (Bauer and Errico, 1991), direct injury to the anterior spinal cord, or with lesions of the inductive spinal artery that provides the blood supply to that tract of spinal cord (Cheshire et al., 1996). Lesions of the inductive spinal avenue may upshot from diseases of the aorta, cardiac or aortic surgery, embolism, polyarteritis nodosa, or angioplasty (Cheshire et al., 1996). Anterior cord syndrome is characterized by a variable loss of motor too every bit pinprick sensation with a relative preservation of light affect, proprioception, and deep-pressure awareness. Due to the massive interest of the anterior and lateral spinal string with inclusion of the cortico-spinal tracts, only 10–20% of the patients with an inductive string syndrome have the chance to recover muscle part, and fifty-fifty in those with some recovery, usually motor forcefulness is low and coordination is lacking; consequently these patients have low walking recovery chances (Bohlman, 1979).

Etiology of the lesion

Well-nigh of the literature on SCI is focused on the rehabilitation of traumatic patients, despite the relevant incidence of non-traumatic lesions, considered to account for a percentage of the full SCIs varying from 30 to 80% (Buchan et al., 1972; Celani et al., 2001; Citterio et al., 2004). Patients with non-traumatic lesions differ from their traumatic counterparts for several prognostic factors. They are ordinarily older, with a more fifty-fifty distribution of genders and a higher frequency of incomplete lesions. Therefore, a straight comparison of these two populations is difficult (Scivoletto et al., 2011). Notwithstanding, when the misreckoning issue of these factors is eliminated by means of statistics, patients with non-traumatic spinal string lesions tin can achieve comparable rates of functional gains equally their traumatic spinal cord injury counterparts (McKinley et al., 2000, 2001; Mckinley et al., 2002). With regard to walking function, recently a number of articles compared the recovery of ambulation in traumatic and non-traumatic SCIs and found that the two populations accomplish comparable walking capacity with an overall pct of patients varying from 35 (Scivoletto et al., 2011) to 49% (Marinho et al., 2012).

Gender

At that place are only few studies on gender related differences in neurological and functional outcomes after inpatient rehabilitation of SCI (Greenwald et al., 2001; Scivoletto et al., 2004b; Sipski et al., 2004). Ii of them (Greenwald et al., 2001; Scivoletto et al., 2004b) found no significant differences between the two genders with regard to daily life independence, motor efficiency, American Spinal Injury Association motor scores (Greenwald et al., 2001) and walking function (Scivoletto et al., 2004b). However, Sipski et al. (2004) found gender-related differences in daily life independence, merely did not specifically focus on walking recovery. Women with SCI may accept more than natural neurologic recovery than men, merely, for a given level and caste of neurologic injury, men tend to do better functionally than women at time of belch from rehabilitation (Sipski et al., 2004).

Formulas and algorithms

In the last iii decades several attempts have been made to link one or more than of the higher up mentioned factors (and of the results of instrumental examinations discussed below) to the prognosis for walking recovery.

Waters et al. (1994b) examined the relationship between lower extremity strength at get-go examination in incomplete paraplegics and walking recovery: all patients with an initial (1-month) lower extremity motor score of ≥10 points ambulated in i twelvemonth. 70 percent of patients with an initial motor score between 1 and 9 ambulated at 1 year. Furthermore, all patients with an initial hip flexor or articulatio genus extensor Grade ≥2 ambulated in the community at 1 year.

The aforementioned writer examined the odds of walking recovery in incomplete tetraplegics and found that, although the relationship between initial lower extremity motor score and walking holds true for tetraplegics, these patients take less chance to achieve ambulation (Waters et al., 1994a): 63% of the patients with an initial lower extremity motor score of ≥10 points ambulated by ane year, vs. 21% of those with an initial motor score between 1 and nine (Waters et al., 1994a). In improver, Waters stressed the relationship between upper extremities strength and ambulation recovery in tetraplegics: patients who are community or household ambulators have significant higher motor scores. The author linked this datum to the importance of upper extremities strength for devices use during walking (Waters et al., 1994a).

Crozier et al. (1992) focused on the timing of recovery of lower extremity motor force and concluded that early recovery of quadriceps force is an excellent prognostic factor for ambulation. All patients with an initial quadriceps strength of at least Class 2/5 who attained a grade of ≥3/5 in at least one quadriceps past 2 months post-injury achieved functional airing (power to walk independently in the community, with or without the use of devices and braces) at follow-upwardly. Notwithstanding, only 25% of those who did not recover quadriceps force of 3/5 within 2 months were able to walk at follow-up.

More recently, Zörner et al. (2010) developed an algorithm based on result predictors and aimed at identifying subgroups of patients in the sub-astute phase who could achieve functional walking. For patients with incomplete paraplegia, lower extremity motor scores, pinprick scores and age were the best predictors for walking recovery. For patients with incomplete tetraplegia the more than reliable predictors were the lower extremity motor scores, the tibial SSEP score and the AIS grade.

In 2011 van Middendorp et al. (2011) produced a unproblematic clinical prediction dominion based on the combination of age (<65 vs. ≥65 years), motor scores of the quadriceps femoris (L3), gastrocsoleus (S1) muscles, and light bear on awareness of dermatomes L3 and S1. This rule showed an excellent discrimination capacity in recognizing patients who achieved independent ambulation (power to walk independently, with or without braces and orthoses for <10 k) at follow-upwardly from those who were dependent walkers or non-walkers.

Instrumental exam

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) (Table ​ 3)

Table 3

Prognostic value of SSEPs and MEPs.

	Six months walking capacity
	Normal (%)	Functional (%)	Therapeutic (%)	No walking (%)
LOWER LIMBS SSEPS AND Ambulation (Curt and Dietz, 1997)
Intial SSEP evaluation
Normal	83	17	0	0
Present, altered	ten	60	10	20
Absent	0	seven	xiii	lxxx
LOWER LIMBS MEP AND Airing (Curt et al., 1998)
Intial MEP evaluation
Normal	100	0	0	0
Absent	11	0	78

SSEPs are used for clinical diagnosis in patients with neurologic illness, and many studies take been performed to determine the value of SSEPs in the prediction of walking recovery in SCI patients (Immature and Dexter, 1979; Kaplan and Rosen, 1981; Young, 1985; Foo, 1986; Ziganow, 1986; Katz et al., 1991; Aalfs et al., 1993; Jacobs et al., 1995; Curt and Dietz, 1997).

Most of these studies conclude that early on SSEPs tin predict motor improvement and ambulation outcome in SCI patients. However, SSEPs do not seem to offering boosted prognostic accurateness if compared to clinical test according to the ISNCSCI for both consummate and incomplete patients (Young and Dexter, 1979; Kaplan and Rosen, 1981; Perot and Vera, 1982; Chabot et al., 1985; Katz et al., 1991; Aalfs et al., 1993; Curt and Dietz, 1997).

When a reliable clinical test, together with the ISNCSCI is impossible (patients unresponsive, for example considering sedated or nether the result of alcohol or drugs, or uncooperative, for case because of pain) and so SSEPs are helpful to determine if they have SCI (Curt and Dietz, 1997). In improver, SSEPs may be helpful to differentiate between SCI and hysteric paraplegia, a differential diagnosis that may be very difficult (Kaplan et al., 1985).

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) (Table ​ iii)

Transcranial magnetic stimulation allows an test of the conductivity of the motor tracts post-obit cortical or spinal lesions in humans. According to a study of Curt, MEPs can contribute toward diagnosing lesions of different neurologic structures inside the spinal cord and in predicting the recovery of functional movements (Brusque et al., 1998). The study shows that MEPs recordings are sensitive to indicate motor tract lesions in approximately xc% of SCI patients and predictive for the recovery of upper and lower limb motor function. In this sense they are of similar prognostic value to clinical exam in the prediction of functional recovery. MEPs tin can be used in combination with the ASIA protocol to follow the recovery of clinical motor functions in relation to that of descending motor tracts for impulse transmission. In Curt'southward study, MEPs were highly predictive of convalescent chapters. All patients with elicitable MEPs at initial test recovered a musculus strength of 3/5 or more of the corresponding muscles. Not surprisingly, MEPs recordings in SCI patients are more sensitive than SSEPs recordings for revealing the interest of motor tract fibers and are at least as sensitive as the ASIA protocol in predicting the resulting functional deficit. Similarly to SSEPs, the use of MEP recordings is generally appropriate in patients who are uncooperative (approximately 15% of patients with astute SCI) (Bozzo et al., 2011).

Magnetic resonance imaging (Table ​ 4)

Table 4

MRI and lesion severity.

Authors	Results
PRESENCE OF HEMORRHAGE AT INITIAL Test
Marciello et al., 1993	Hemorrage = low upper extremity and no lower extremity recovery
Flanders et al., 1990	Hemorrage = decreased motor power, lower motor recovery charge per unit, and fewer muscles with useful function
Ramón et al., 1997	Hemorrage = complete injury
SIZE OF HEMORRHAGE
Boldin et al., 2006;
Flanders et al., 1990;	Small hemorrhage = higher recovery rates
Schaefer et al., 1992
Bondurant et al., 1990;	No relationship between hemorrhage size and recovery
Flanders et al., 1996
PRESENCE OF EDEMA
Flanders et al., 1996	Edema = prognosis of recovery to functional levels (D/E)
Ramón et al., 1997	Edema = association with incomplete syndromes
SIZE OF EDEMA
Flanders et al., 1990;	Caste of edema is inversely proportional to initial impairment and future recovery
Flanders et al., 1996;
Ramón et al., 1997
Boldin et al., 2006; Flanders et al., 1990	Multiple levels involvement = poorer prognosis and greater chance of complete lesions
Flanders et al., 1996	Interest of simply one to three segments = improved prognosis

Before the advent of MRI, in that location were no imaging methods to appraise the severity of traumatic SCI. MRI provides a rapid not-invasive means of evaluating the condition of spinal cord parenchyma and depicting the injured spinal cord and accurately showing the extent of macroscopic harm (Yamashita et al., 1991). Information technology should exist noted, nevertheless, that to the best of our cognition, no study examined the human relationship between MRI aspect and walking recovery, only merely with neurologic recovery (AIS class conversion) that is only partially related to walking (see above).

For prognostic purposes the T2 sagittal images seem to be the most useful ones, while T1 and centric images do not correlate with the prognosis (Bozzo et al., 2011). A damaged spinal cord exhibits a variable amount of intramedullary hemorrhage and edema. Both the presence of these two features and the amount of parenchyma that is affected by hemorrhage and edema are straight related to the degree of initial neurologic deficit and to the prognosis (Bondurant et al., 1990; Flemish region et al., 1990). Based on these aspects, Bondurant and associates (Bondurant et al., 1990) proposed a classification which consider iv different MRI patterns: Design i shows a normal MRI signal in the cord; pattern 2 represents single-level edema; pattern iii is multi-level edema; and pattern 4 is mixed hemorrhage and edema.

Most studies showed that patients with spinal cord hemorrhage volition have decreased motor power, lower motor recovery rates, and fewer muscles with useful office, 1 yr after injury in comparison with subjects with pocket-sized, non-hemorrhagic lesions (Bondurant et al., 1990; Flanders et al., 1990, 1996; Yamashita et al., 1991; Schaefer et al., 1992; Marciello et al., 1993; Sato et al., 1994; Ramón et al., 1997); hemorrhage on initial MRI (within xv days from the lesion) is associated with a complete injury in well-nigh 100% of the patients (Ramón et al., 1997). If no hemorrhage is seen on initial MRI, patients volition have an incomplete lesion and take a significantly better prognosis for motor recovery in the upper and lower extremities, as well every bit improvement in their Frankel and/or ASIA impairment scale nomenclature (Schaefer et al., 1992).

Information technology is unclear whether the size of the hemorrhage is a prognostic characteristic. Some authors (Flanders et al., 1990; Schaefer et al., 1992; Boldin et al., 2006) take shown that small hemorrhages may offer higher recovery rates; others showed no difference based on the size of the hemorrhage (Bondurant et al., 1990; Flanders et al., 1996).

With regard to spinal cord edema, this MRI finding seems to have a good prognostic value. In incomplete SCIs, the finding of edema in MRI is associated with a good prognosis of neurological recovery (Flemish region et al., 1996). Furthermore, the incomplete syndromes, such as the Brown-Sèquard syndrome, seem to be associated with the edema pattern (Ramón et al., 1997). Nonetheless, if the edema involves multiple levels, it tends to be associated with a poorer prognosis and a greater chance of having a complete lesion (Flanders et al., 1996; Boldin et al., 2006). If the cord edema is express to i to three segments but, so the lesion is usually milder in nature, with an improved prognosis (Bauer and Errico, 1991).

Based on the classification of Bondurant et al. (1990), Bozzo et al. (2011) reviewed the data of several articles (Schaefer et al., 1992; Shimada and Tokioka, 1999; Andreoli et al., 2005) and found a correlation with the AIS conversion of patients. As already reported hemorrhage is the more than astringent MRI aspect, with about 95% of patients remaining with the same AIS grade of access examination. Patients with lengthened edema besides showed a poor improvement, as only 28% of them showed an comeback of AIS form. Conversely, patients with single level edema pattern showed a good neurological issue every bit ninety% of them improved for a hateful of 1.ix AIS grades.

Other positive correlations have been described: greater caste of cord pinch, greater degree of canal compromise, and the severity of soft tissue injuries seem to be all associated with poorer neurological outcomes (Flanders et al., 1996; Selden et al., 1999; Dai and Jia, 2000; Miyanji et al., 2007; Song et al., 2008).

Handling

In the last decade several interventions aiming at reducing the spinal cord damage (neuroprotection) have been proposed (Becker and McDonald, 2012). Nevertheless, these interventions are still at an experimental level (Becker and McDonald, 2012). Therefore, in the following paragraphs we will focus simply on the use and efficacy of high dose methylprednisolone (which, although questioned, is still the most widely used pharmacological treatment in the astute phase of SCI) and of early on surgical intervention. It should be noticed that in both cases, studies referred to neurological comeback rather than to walking recovery. Therefore, information on the efficacy of these treatments on ambulation are not bachelor.

Methylprednisolone

The administration of loftier-dose methylprednisolone (MP) to patients with spinal string injuries has been reported in the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies (NASCIS, NASCIS-II, and NASCIS-Three) (Bracken et al., 1984, 1990, 1997). Since then, the apply of MP increased and became a standard of care for astute traumatic SCIs (Hurlbert, 2001). Information technology has been hypothesized that MP attenuates the inflammatory cascade and lessens lipid peroxidation, thus decreasing secondary Spinal Cord impairment (Delamarter et al., 1995). In the NASCIS studies, the 24 and 48 h administration of high dose MP produced an important neurologic recovery (AIS form improvement) paralleled by a functional amelioration (Bracken et al., 1997). Nonetheless, several recent revisions of NASCIS protocols and other randomized trials questioned the efficacy of steroids administration to achieve a neurologic improvement (Hurlbert, 2001; Matsumoto et al., 2001; Suberviola et al., 2008; Bydon et al., 2013). Furthermore, the 48-h–infusion of MP seems to be associated with an increased risk of pneumonia, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and steroid myopathy (Pointillart et al., 2000; Quian et al., 2004).

Based on these evidences, both the Consortium for Spinal String Medicine clinical practice guidelines (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine, 2007) and the neurosurgical guidelines (2002) consider the utilise of high-dose MP to be a handling option rather than a standard.

Surgery trials

The undisputed benefits of surgical handling for unstable vertebral injuries include decreased infirmary stay, fewer sequelae from prolonged immobilization, and more rapid access to the rehabilitation system (Raineteau and Schwab, 2001).

Despite these testify, the timing of decompression of the neural elements, and, in particular, the efficacy of early decompression (within 24 h) in improving neurologic recovery is still a matter of contend (Fehlings and Tator, 1999; Fehlings and Perrin, 2005). A meta-analysis of studies of early decompression from 1966 through 2000 (La Rosa et al., 2004), showed that surgery performed inside 24 h produced a significant improvement in neurological recovery compared with late surgery, but concluded that the evidence was not strong and that early surgery could be considered only equally a exercise choice.

Starting from this framework, a recent prospective multicentric study (Fehlings et al., 2012) demonstrated that the odds of achieving a 2 AIS grade comeback is 2.viii times higher in patients undergoing early on surgical decompression (inside 24 h). However, a contempo meta-assay (van Middendorp et al., 2013) reported a lack of statistical robustness of the manufactures examined, therefore the relationship between early surgery and ameliorate neurological outcome is still to be demonstrated.

Give-and-take

This review demonstrates that the chance of walking recovery after a SCI tin can be accurately predicted on the base of demographic data and clinical examination. Patients with complete sensory-motor lesions take very express possibility of achieving walking office at follow up, and also if they are able to ambulate they usually are "limited ambulators." The chances of walking recovery better in less severe lesions, as demonstrated past AIS B and C subjects. AIS B patients can recover walking especially if their clinical picture shows a less severe involvement of the spinal string (light impact and pinprick conservation = some sparing of the spino-thalamic and posterior columns tracts = higher possibility of cortico-spinal tracts preservation). Finally, subjects with AIS C lesions are bound to walk, especially the younger ones. This prognosis for walking may be sustained and empowered by instrumental examinations that help to appraise the severity of the lesion and, in some cases (SSEPs and MEPs) are direct correlated with walking function.

The need to predict outcome based on expected neurological recovery and associated functional recovery has been emphasized as essential for health care planning (Ditunno, 1999) and this need is partially unmet.

During the kickoff few days after SCI, definitive management strategies are formulated, which oft include aggressive surgical decompression of the spinal string (Wilson et al., 2012). This is also the time of greatest anguish for an injured patient and their family unit as they face significant prognostic incertitude. A precise knowledge of the prognosis makes it possible to respond questions regarding part that patients usually ask after spinal cord injury: "Volition I walk again?" and "What will I be able to practice?" Furthermore, in countries with health intendance systems based on insurance, rehabilitation professionals accept to justify and fight for appropriate services; furthermore they take to know how to allocate resource. Therefore, predicting recovery has go a rehabilitative imperative (Ditunno, 1999).

Finally, better noesis of the course and prognosis of recovery after SCI and an understanding of the underlying mechanisms would help in the development of strategies and treatments to enhance neurological recovery. The number of interventions, therapies, and devices that accept been developed and proposed to improve functional outcomes after SCI is enormous; several of these proposal volition undergo clinical trials in the most future. Some early stage SCI clinical trials have recently been started and some experimental therapies take been introduced into clinical practice without a clinical trial being completed. Prognostic data are essential to evaluate the efficacy of new drugs and therapies (for case to distinguish between the natural recovery and the effect of treatments) and to project the clinical trials (for example to calculate the number of patients needed to obtain statistical ability) (Fawcett et al., 2006).

Limitations

This article has several limitations due to the nature of the works examined. Some of them are based on modest sample sizes and the definition of walking function and of follow up time points vary beyond the studies. Furthermore, these articles mainly represent the feel from Us and, in part, Europe. Therefore, they do not reflect the whole globe standards of intendance. As SCI management may differ in different geographical areas, the rates of recovery of walking could vary to. Finally, the distribution in time of the works examined is non regular. Although the study of the prognostic factors is still a affair of involvement, most of the articles related to clinical factors date back to the 80 southward and 90 s. Some prognostic factors may change over time as SCI direction evolves. Based on these limitations the results of these studies could not be necessarily generalizable Nonetheless, the factors that we examined here are still considered the base of the prognosis of SCI outcome (Burns et al., 2012).

Funding

Supported in part by grant RC12G of the Italian Ministry of Health and grant P133 of the International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia to Giorgio Scivoletto.

Conflict of interest argument

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed equally a potential conflict of interest.

References

• (2002). Management of astute cardinal cervical spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery l(iii Suppl), S166–S172 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Aalfs C. Thousand., Koelman J. H., Meyjes F. E., de Visser B. West. O. (1993). Posterior tibial and sural nervus somatosensory evoked potentials: a study in spastic paraparesis in spinal string lesions. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 89, 437–441 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90118-9 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Aito South., D'Andrea M., Werhagen L., Farsetti 50., Cappelli Southward., Bandini B., et al. (2006). Neurological and functional outcome in traumatic cardinal cord syndrome. Spinal Cord 45, 292–297 10.1038/sj.sc.3101944 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• American Spinal Injury Association. (2000). International standards for neurological classifications of spinal cord Injury (revised). Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association [Google Scholar]
• Andreoli C., Colaiacomo Thou. C., Rojas Beccaglia Thousand., Di Biasi C., Casciani E., Gualdi Thou. (2005). MRI in the acute phase of spinal cord traumatic lesions: Relationship between MRI findings and neurological outcome. Radiol. Med. 110, 636–645 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Bauer R. D., Errico T. J. (1991). Cervical spine injuries, in Spinal Trauma, eds Errico T. J., Bauer R. D., Waugh T. (Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; ), 71–121 [Google Scholar]
• Becker D., McDonald J. Westward., 3rd. (2012). Approaches to repairing the damaged spinal cord: overview. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 109, 445–461 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-eight.00028-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bohlman H. H. (1979). Astute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 61, 1119–1142 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Boldin C., Raith J., Fankhauser F., Haunschmid C., Schwantzer G., Schweighofer F. (2006). Predicting neurologic recovery in cervical spinal cord injury with postoperative MR imaging. Spine 31, 554–559 ten.1097/01.brs.0000201274.59427.a4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bondurant F. J., Cotler H. B., Kulkarni Thousand. V., McArdle C. B., Harris J. H. (1990). Astute spinal string injury: a study using physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine xv, 161–168 ten.1097/00007632-199003000-00002 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bozzo A., Marcoux J., Radhakrishna 1000., Pelletier J., Goulet B. (2011). The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of acute spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 28, 1401–1411 10.1089/neu.2009.1236 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bracken Grand. B., Collins W. F., Freeman D. F., Shepard One thousand. J., Wagner F. W., Silten R. Grand., et al. (1984). Efficacy of methylprednisolone in astute spinal cord injury. JAMA 251, 45–52 x.1001/jama.1984.03340250025015 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bracken K. B., Shepard Yard. J., Collins W. F., Holford T. R., Young W., Baskin D. S., et al. (1990). A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the 2nd national astute spinal cord injury study. North. Engl. J. Med. 322, 1405–1411 ten.1056/NEJM199005173222001 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bracken M. B., Shepard Thousand. J., Holford T. R., Leo-Summers Fifty., Aldrich E. F., Fazl K., et al. (1997). Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the third national acute spinal cord injury randomized controlled trial. national acute spinal string injury report. JAMA 277, 1597–1604 ten.1001/jama.1997.03540440031029 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Brown-Sequard C. E. (1868). Lectures on the physiology and pathology of the central nervous system and the handling of organic nervous angel. Lancet 2, 593–595, 659–662, 755–757, 821–823. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)52465-Ten [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Buchan A. C., Fulford Chiliad. Due east., Jellineck E., Kerr W. G., Newsam J. E., Stark K. D. (1972). A preliminary survey of the incidence and etiology of spinal paralysis. Paraplegia 10, 23–28 10.1038/sc.1972.v [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Burns A. S., Marino R. J., Flanders A. E., Flett H. (2012). Clinical diagnosis and prognosis post-obit spinal string injury. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 109, 47–62 x.1016/B978-0-444-52137-viii.00003-vi [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Burns S. P., Golding D. G., Rolle Due west. A., Jr., Graziani V., Ditunno J. F. (1997). Recovery of airing in motor incomplete tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, 1169–1172 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90326-9 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bydon M., Lin J., Macki 1000., Gokaslan Z. L., Bydon A. (2013). The current role of steroids in acute spinal cord injury. Globe Neurosurg. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.062 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Celani M. G., Spizzichino L., Ricci South., Zampolini M., Franceschini M. (2001). Spinal cord injury in Italy: a multicenter retrospective study. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehab. 82, 589–596 10.1053/apmr.2001.21948 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Chabot R., York D. H., Watts C., Waugh Due west. A. (1985). Somatosensory evoked potentials evaluated in normal subjects in spinal string injured patients. J. Neurosurg. 63, 544–551 ten.3171/jns.1985.63.4.0544 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Cheshire W. E., Santos C. C., Massey East. W., Howard J. E. (1996). Spinal string infarction: etiology and result. Neurology 47, 321–330 x.1212/WNL.47.2.321 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Citterio A., Franceschini G., Spizzichino Fifty., Reggio A., Rossi B., Stampacchia G. (2004). Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: an Italian survey. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1483–1487 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.028 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Consortium for Spinal String Medicine. (2007). Early Acute Management in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: a Clinical Do Guideline for Health-Care Providers. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America [Google Scholar]
• Crozier Yard. Southward., Cheng L. Fifty., Graziani V., Zorn Thousand., Herbison G., Ditunno J. F., Jr. (1992). Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on quadriceps recovery. Paraplegia 30, 762–767 10.1038/sc.1992.147 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Crozier K. Due south., Graziani V., Ditunno J. F., Jr., Herbison Yard. J. (1991). Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on sensory examination in patients who are initially motor complete. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 72, 119–121 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Brusk A., Dietz V. (1997). Ambulatory capacity in spinal string injury: significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocols in predicting outcome. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, 39–43 x.1016/S0003-9993(97)90007-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Curt A., Keck 1000. Eastward., Dietz 5. (1998). Functional outcome following spinal cord injury: significance of motor-evoked potentials and ASIA scores. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 81–86 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90213-ane [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Dai 50., Jia Fifty. (2000). Central cord injury complicating acute cervical disc herniation in trauma. Spine 25, 331–335 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00012 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Delamarter R. B., Sherman J., Carr J. B. (1995). Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury: recovery after firsthand and delayed compression. J. Os Joint Surg. Am. 77, 1042–1049 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• DiGiovanna A. G. (2000). Human Ageing: Biological Perspectives, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Companies [Google Scholar]
• Ditunno J. F. (1999). The John Stanley Coulter Lecture. Predicting recovery after spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation imperative. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80, 361–364 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Ditunno J. F., Scivoletto G., Patrick M., Biering-Sorensen F., Abel R., Marino R. (2008b). Validation of the walking index for spinal cord injury in a US and European clinical population. Spinal Cord 46, 181–188 10.1038/sj.sc.3102071 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ditunno P. L., Patrick M., Stineman Thou., Ditunno J. F. (2008a). Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery later on SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 46, 500–506 10.1038/sj.sc.3102172 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Domingo A., Al-Yahya A. A., Asiri Y., Eng J. J., Tania Lam T., Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Research Team. (2012). A systematic review of the furnishings of pharmacological agents on walking function in people with spinal string injury. J. Neurotrauma 29, 865–879 10.1089/neu.2011.2052 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Dvorak M. F., Fisher C. Grand., Hoekema J., Boyd M., Noonan V., Fly P. C., et al. (2005). Factors Predicting motor recovery and functional event after traumatic primal cord syndrome a long-term follow-up. Spine xxx, 2303–2311 10.1097/01.brs.0000182304.35949.11 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fawcett J. W., Curt A., Steeves J. D., Coleman W. P., Tuszynski Chiliad. H., Lammertse D., et al. (2006). Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal string injury as developed by the ICCP console: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord 45, 190–205 ten.1038/sj.sc.3102007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fehlings M. G., Perrin R. Thou. (2005). The role and timing of early decompression for cervical spine injury: update with a review of the recent clinical evidence. Injury 36(Suppl. 2), B13–B26 x.1016/j.injury.2005.06.011 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fehlings Thou. G., Tator C. H. (1999). An evidence-based review of decompressive surgery in acute spinal string injury: rationale, indications, and timing based on experimental and clinical studies. J. Neurosurg. Spine 91, ane–11 10.3171/spi.1999.91.1.0001 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fehlings Grand. G., Vaccaro A., Wilson J. R., Singh A. Due west., Cadotte D., Harrop J. S., et al. (2012). Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Astute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS One 7:e32037 ten.1371/periodical.pone.0032037 [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Flanders A. E., Schaefer D. M., Doan H. T., Mishkin M. M., Gonzalez C. F., Northrup B. E. (1990). Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology 177, 25–33 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Flemish region A. E., Spettell C. M., Tartaglino L. Yard., Friedman D. P., Herbison G. J. (1996). Forecasting motor recovery after cervical spinal string injury: value of MR imaging. Radiology 201, 649–655 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Foo D. (1986). Spinal string injury in forty-four patients with cervical spondylosis. Paraplegia 24, 301–306 x.1038/sc.1986.42 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Foo D., Subrahmanyan T. South., Rossier A. B. (1981). Post-traumatic astute anterior spinal string syndrome. Paraplegia. 19, 201–205 10.1038/sc.1981.42 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Admirer D., Harrington M. (1984). Penetrating injury of the spinal cord. Injury 16, 7–8 10.1016/0020-1383(84)90101-3 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Greenwald B. D., Seel R. T., Cifu D. X., Shah A. North. (2001). Gender-related differences in acute rehabilitation lengths of stay, charges, and functional outcomes for a matched sample with spinal cord injury: a multicenter investigation. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82, 1181–1187 10.1053/apmr.2001.24891 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Herbison Grand. J., Zerby S. A., Cohen M. Due east., Marino R. J., Ditunno J. E. (1991). Motor power difference within the first ii weeks postal service-SCI in cervical spinal cord quadriplegic subjects. J. Neurotrauma nine, 373–380 10.1089/neu.1992.9.373 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Hurlbert R. J. (2001). The function of steroids in acute spinal cord injury. An evidence-based analysis. Spine 26, S39–S46 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00009 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Hussey R. W., Stauffer E. S. (1973). Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 54, 544–547 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Jacobs S. R., Yeaney North. 1000., Herbison Chiliad. J., Ditunno J. F., Jr. (1995). Futurity airing prognosis as predicted by somatosensory evoked potentials in motor complete and incomplete quadriplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 76, 635–641 x.1016/S0003-9993(95)80632-half dozen [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Jakob W., Wirz Thou., van Hedel H. J., Dietz V., EM-SCI Written report Group. (2009). Difficulty of elderly SCI subjects to translate motor recovery—"body office"–into daily living activities. J. Neurotrauma 26, 2037–2044 ten.1089/neu.2008.0824 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kaplan B. J., Friedman Westward. A., Gavenstein D. (1985). Somatosensory evoked potential in hysterical paraplegia. Surg. Neurol. 23, 502–506 10.1016/0090-3019(85)90246-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kaplan P. E., Rosen J. Southward. (1981). Somatosensory evoked potentials in spinal string injured patients. Paraplegia xix, 118–122 10.1038/sc.1981.26 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Katoh S., el Masry W. S. (1995). Motor recovery of patients presenting with motor paralysis and sensory sparing following cervical spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 33, 506–509 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Katz R. T., Tolkeikis R. J., Knuth A. Due east. (1991). Somatosensory-evoked and dermatomal-evoked potentials are non clinically useful in the prognostication of acute spinal string injury. Spine 16, 730–735 x.1097/00007632-199107000-00007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kirshblum S. C., O'Connor Thousand. C. (1998). Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 1456–1466 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Ko H-Y., Ditunno J. F., Graziani V., Niggling J. W. (1999). The design of reflex recovery during spinal shock. Spinal Cord 37, 402–409 10.1038/sj.sc.3100840 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• La Rosa Grand., Conti A., Cardali S., Cacciola F., Tomasello F. (2004). Does early decompression better neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-belittling approach. Spinal Cord 42, 503–512 ten.1038/sj.sc.3101627 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Marciello M., Flanders A. Due east., Herbison Yard. J., Schaefer D. 1000., Friedman D. P., Lane J. I. (1993). Magnetic resonance imaging related to neurologic outcome in cervical spinal cord injury. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74, 940–946 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Marinho A. R., Flett H. M., Craven C., Ottensmeyer C. A., Parsons D., Verrier Yard. C. (2012). Walking-related outcomes for individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury inform physical therapy practice. J. Spinal Cord Med. 35, 371–381 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000038 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Matsumoto T., Tamaki T., Kawakami M., Yoshida 1000., Ando M., Yamada H. (2001). Early complications of loftier-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate treatment in the follow-up of acute cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 26, 426–430 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00020 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Maynard F. Thou., Glen G. R., Fountain Due south., Wilmot C., Hamilton R. (1979). Neurological prognosis after traumatic quadriplegia. J. Neurosurg. fifty, 611–616 10.3171/jns.1979.50.five.0611 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Maynard F. K., Jr., Bracken Thou. B., Creasey G., Ditunno J. F., Jr., Donovan W. H., Ducker T. B., et al. (1997). International standards for neurological and functional nomenclature of spinal string injury patients (revised). Spinal Cord 35, 266–274 10.1038/sj.sc.3100432 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• McKinley Westward., Santos K., Meade Chiliad., Brooke K. (2007). Incidence and outcomes of spinal cord injury clinical syndromes. J. Spinal Cord Med. 30, 215–224 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• McKinley W. O., Huang G. E., Tewksbury M. A. (2000). Neoplastic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury: an inpatient rehabilitation comparison. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 138–144 10.1097/00002060-200003000-00005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• McKinley W. O., Seel R. T., Gadi R. K., Tewksbury M. A. (2001). Nontraumatic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehab. eighty, 693–699 10.1097/00002060-200109000-00010 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Mckinley W. O., Tewksbury G. A., Mujteba North. Yard. (2002). Spinal stenosis vs traumatic spinal string injury: a rehabilitation consequence comparing. J. Spinal Cord Med. 25, 28–32 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Merriam West. Eastward., Taylor T. K. F., Ruff S. J., McPhail M. J. (1986). A reappraisal of acute traumatic central cord syndrome. J. Bone Joint Surg. 68B, 708–713 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Miyanji F., Furlan J. C., Aarabi B., Arnold P. G., Fehlings M. G. (2007). Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome—prospective report with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology 243, 820–827 ten.1148/radiol.2433060583 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Newey G. L., Sen P. K., Fraser R. D. (2000). The long-term outcome afterward central string syndrome: a study of the natural history. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 82, 851–855 10.1302/0301-620X.82B6.9866 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Oleson C. V., Burns A. S., Ditunno J. F., Geisler F. H., Coleman W. P. (2005). Prognostic value of pinprick preservation in motor complete, sensory incomplete spinal cord injury. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86, 988–992 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.031 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Pagliacci M. C., Celani Yard. Thou., Spizzichino L., Zampolini Chiliad., Aito South., Citterio A., et al. (2003). Gruppo Italiano Studio Epidemiologico Mielolesioni (GISEM) Group. spinal cord lesion management in Italy: a 2-year survey. Spinal Cord 41, 620–628 10.1038/sj.sc.3101521 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Penrod 50. Eastward., Hegde S. Yard., Ditunno J. Due east. (1990). Age effect on prognosis for functional recovery in astute, traumatic key string syndrome. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 71, 963–968 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Perot P. L., Vera C. Fifty. (1982). Scalp-recorded somatosensory evoked potentials to stimulation of fretfulness in the lower extremities and evaluation of patients with spinal cord trauma. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388, 359–368 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb50802.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Pointillart V., Petitjean G. E., Wiart L., Vital J. M., Lassie P., Thicoipe Thou., et al. (2000). Pharmacological therapy of spinal cord injury during the astute phase. Spinal String 38, 71–76 10.1038/sj.sc.3100962 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Quian T., Guo X., Levi A. D., Vanni S., Shebert R. T., Sipski M. 50. (2004). High-dose methylprednisolone may cause myopathy in acute spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 43, 199–203 ten.1038/sj.sc.3101681 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Raineteau O., Schwab M. E. (2001). Plasticity of motor systems afterward incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 263–273 ten.1038/35067570 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ramón S., Domínguez R., Ramírez Fifty., Paraira 1000., Olona 1000., Castelló T., et al. (1997). Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging correlation in acute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 35, 664–673 10.1038/sj.sc.3100490 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Roth East. J., Lawler Thousand. H., Yarkony G. Thousand. (1990). Traumatic central cord syndrome: clinical features and functional outcomes. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 71, 18–23 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Roth East. J., Park T., Pang T., Yarkony 1000. M., Lee Grand. Y. (1991). Traumatic cervical Brown-Sequard and Brown-Sequard plus syndromes: the spectrum of presentations and outcomes. Paraplegia 29, 582–589 10.1038/sc.1991.86 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Sato T., Kokubun S., Rijal K. P., Ojima T., Moriai North., Hashimoto M., et al. (1994). Prognosis of cervical spinal cord injury in correlation with magnetic resonance imaging. Paraplegia 32, 81–85 10.1038/sc.1994.14 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Schaefer D. K., Flanders A. E., Osterholm J. 50., Northrup B. E. (1992). Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in the acute phase of cervical spine injury. J. Neurosurg. 76, 218–223 10.3171/jns.1992.76.two.0218 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto Chiliad., Farchi Due south., Laurenza 50., Molinari M. (2011). Traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord lesions: an Italian comparison of neurological and functional outcomes. Spinal Cord 49, 391–396 10.1038/sc.2010.85 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto G., Morganti B., Ditunno P., Ditunno J. F., Molinari M. (2003). Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients' rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 41, 457–464 10.1038/sj.sc.3101489 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto G., Morganti B., Molinari M. (2004a). Neurologic recovery of spinal cord injury patients in Italy. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 485–489 ten.1016/S0003-9993(03)00766-iv [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto G., Morganti B., Molinari M. (2004b). Sexual activity-related differences of rehabilitation outcomes of spinal string lesion patients. Clin. Rehabil. 18, 709–713 10.1191/0269215504cr749oa [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Selden N. R., Quint D. J., Patel Due north., D'Arcy H. S., Papadopoulos S. One thousand. (1999). Emergency magnetic resonance imaging of cervical spinal cord injuries: clinical correlation and prognosis. Neurosurgery 44, 785–792 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Shimada K., Tokioka T. (1999). Sequential MR studies of cervical string injury: correlation with neurological damage and clinical outcome. Spinal Cord 37, 410–415 10.1038/sj.sc.3100858 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Sipski M. Fifty., Jackson A. B., Gómez-Marín O., Estores I., Stein A. (2004). Effects of gender on neurologic and functional recovery after spinal string injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1826–1836 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.031 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Song K. J., Kim G. H., Lee K. B. (2008). The efficacy of the modified classification system of soft tissue injury in extension injury of the lower cervical spine. Spine 33, E488–E493 ten.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b6191 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Stahlman G. C., Hanley E. North. (1992). Surgical management of spinal injuries, in Skeletal Trauma, eds Browner B. D., Jupiter J. B., Levine A. Grand., Trafton P. Grand. (Philadelphia: WB Saunders; ), 837–860 [Google Scholar]
• Steeves J. D., Lammertse D., Brusque A., Fawcett J. W., Tuszynski M. H., Ditunno J. F., et al. (2007). International entrada for cures of spinal cord injury paralysis. guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal string injury (SCI) equally adult by the ICCP console: clinical trial outcome measures. Spinal Cord 45, 190–205 x.1038/sj.sc.3102008 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Suberviola B., Gonzalez-Castro A., Llorca J., Ortiz-Melon F., Minambres East. (2008). Early complications of loftier-dose methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury patients. Injury 39, 748–752 10.1016/j.injury.2007.12.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Vaccaro A. R., Daugherty R. J., Sheehan T. P., Dante Southward. J., Cotler J. M., Balderston R. A., et al. (1997). Neurologic result of early on versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 22, 2609–2613 ten.1097/00007632-199711150-00006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Middendorp J. J., Hosman A. J., Doi Southward. A. (2013). The effects of the timing of spinal surgery afterward traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurotrauma 30, 1781–1794 ten.1089/neu.2013.2932 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Middendorp J. J., Hosman A. J., Donders A. R., Pouw M. H., Ditunno J. F., Jr., Curt A., et al. (2011). A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal string injury: a longitudinal cohort report. Lancet 377, 1004–1010 x.1016/S0140-6736(ten)62276-3 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Middendorp J. J., Hosman A. J., Pouw Chiliad. H., EM-SCI Study Grouping, Van de Meent H. (2009). ASIA impairment calibration conversion in traumatic SCI: is it related with the power to walk? A descriptive comparing with functional ambulation effect measures in 273 patients. Spinal Cord 47, 555–560 10.1038/sc.2008.162 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Waters R. L., Adkins R. H., Yakura J. Southward., Sie I. (1994a). Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 306–311 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Waters R. L., Adkins R. H., Yakura J. S., Sie I. (1994b). Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 67–72 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-v [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Weinstein D. E., Ko H. Y., Graziani V., Ditunno J. F., Jr. (1997). Prognostic significance of the delayed plantar reflex post-obit spinal string injury. Spinal String Med. 20, 207–211 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Wernig A., Muller S. (1992). Laufband locomotion with trunk weight support improved walking in persons with severe spinal string injuries. Paraplegia 30, 229–238 10.1038/sc.1992.61 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Wilson J. R., Grossman R. G., Frankowski R. F., Kiss A., Davis A. M., Kulkarni A. V., et al. (2012). A clinical prediction model for long-term functional outcome subsequently traumatic spinal string injury based on acute clinical and imaging factors. J. Neurotrauma 29, 2263–2271 x.1089/neu.2012.2417 [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Yamashita Y., Takahashi Thou., Matsuno Y., Kojima R., Sakamoto Y., Oguni T., et al. (1991). Astute spinal cord injury: magnetic resonance imaging correlated with myelopathy. Br. J. Radiol. 64, 201–209 ten.1259/0007-1285-64-759-201 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Young J. South., Dexter W. R. (1979). Neurological recovery distal to the zone of injury in 172 cases of closed, traumatic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 16, 39–49 ten.1038/sc.1978.vi [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Young W. (1985). Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in spinal cord injury, in Spinal String Monitoring, eds Schranml J., Jones Southward. J. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag; ), 127–142 [Google Scholar]
• Ziganow S. (1986). Neurometric evaluation of the cortical somatosensory evoked potential in astute incomplete spinal cord injuries. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65, 86–93 x.1016/0168-5597(86)90040-seven [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Zörner B., Blanckenhorn W. U., Dietz 5., EM-SCI Study Grouping, Curt A. (2010). Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of airing and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 27, 241–252 x.1089/neu.2009.0901 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

---

Articles from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

---

dossantosfrated.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3952432/

Share this post